I favor the view of Churchill:cb1000rider wrote:Interesting opinion. You think that there are some number of erroneous convictions. I think that if you're young and poor, it's often in your best interest to plea to a crime. In both cases, assuming the result is a felony conviction, you lose the right to vote, possess firearms, and usually hold meaningful employment for the rest of your life. It's that last one that's a bit of a bear. And I'm with you - if you're a felon rightly convicted, perhaps you deserve what you got.. And will get for the rest of your life.JALLEN wrote:Sorry, but a felon loses, or ought to lose, the civil rights that law abiding citizens enjoy. The right to vote, possess firearms and more.
Felonies used to carry the death penalty long ago. That may be a bit stiff, considering how many convictions are erroneous.
I just see too many DA's playing with charges... Some people - probably the vast minority, get a raw deal that sticks with them for life. I guess that's the cost of punishing the ones that did deserve it.
Yea, I don't have a solution.
I cannot accept the idea of pleading guilty unless I am. Of course, I have never been guilty of a felony, so perhaps I lack experience. Make 'em prove it! A lot of times, the motivation for a plea bargain is their case is shot full of holes. If you didn't do it, don't say you did.never give in, never give in, never, never, never-in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.
The cases I refer to were cases of mistaken identification usually. A fellow was released a year or so ago who had been in prison for ~20 years, until finally DNA proved it was another guy. He didn't plead guilty IIRC but was convicted by a jury, wrongly it turns out. It happens.