Sometimes throwing the anti-gun crowd a bone will help sway public opinion and perception that at least something is being done. At this point, it is easy for the anti-gun crowd to sway the less informed less interested emotionally driven public their way.
I don't think anyone believes this will satisfy their objectives but it may help strengthen the pro 2nd Amendment position.
Then again, I am a complete amateur in the political arena and am doing my best to learn how the game is played as we go.
Search found 9 matches
Return to “Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing”
- Fri Mar 08, 2013 5:58 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
- Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:26 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
I was the one looking for the actual language of the bill and definitions of the proposed federal legislation. You are the one that provided wrong information and then tried to justify it with "conjecture" and speculation.KaiserB wrote:Because I choose facts over conjecture... well it does not make for good internet conversations into the hypothetical. I guess I should have made some type of emotional response to this, that way I could please everyone.mojo84 wrote:KaiserB wrote:mojo84 wrote:What are the disqualifying mental illnesses and who determines who has those disqualifying illnesses? Does it matter to what degree someone must be ill with one of the illnesses to disqualify them from gun ownership?
These details need to be ironed out before an informed decision can be made about whether this is a good idea or not. We don't need another pass it so we can find out what is in it law.
That has ALREADY been defined. 30 seconds on Google will get you this:
(d) For purposes of Subsection (a)(7), a person is incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person:
(1) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition that causes or is likely to cause substantial impairment in judgment, mood, perception, impulse control, or intellectual ability;
(2) suffers from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subdivision (1) that:
(A) is in remission but is reasonably likely to redevelop at a future time; or
(B) requires continuous medical treatment to avoid redevelopment;
(3) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician, determined by a review board or similar authority, or declared by a court to be incompetent to manage the person's own affairs; or
(4) has entered in a criminal proceeding a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.
(e) The following constitutes evidence that a person has a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d)(1):
(1) involuntary psychiatric hospitalization;
(2) psychiatric hospitalization;
(3) inpatient or residential substance abuse treatment in the preceding five-year period;
(4) diagnosis in the preceding five-year period by a licensed physician that the person is dependent on alcohol, a controlled substance, or a similar substance; or
(5) diagnosis at any time by a licensed physician that the person suffers or has suffered from a psychiatric disorder or condition consisting of or relating to:
(A) schizophrenia or delusional disorder;
(B) bipolar disorder;
(C) chronic dementia, whether caused by illness, brain defect, or brain injury;
(D) dissociative identity disorder;
(E) intermittent explosive disorder; or
(F) antisocial personality disorder.
(f) Notwithstanding Subsection (d), a person who has previously been diagnosed as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d) or listed in Subsection (e) is not because of that disorder or condition incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person provides the department with a certificate from a licensed physician whose primary practice is in the field of psychiatry stating that the psychiatric disorder or condition is in remission and is not reasonably likely to develop at a future time.
(g) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2), a person who is at least 18 years of age but not yet 21 years of age is eligible for a license to carry a concealed handgun if the person:
(1) is a member or veteran of the United States armed forces, including a member or veteran of the reserves or national guard;
(2) was discharged under honorable conditions, if discharged from the United States armed forces, reserves, or national guard; and
(3) meets the other eligibility requirements of Subsection (a) except for the minimum age required by federal law to purchase a handgun.
(h) The issuance of a license to carry a concealed handgun to a person eligible under Subsection (g) does not affect the person's ability to purchase a handgun or ammunition under federal law.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 10.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 9.03(a), 9.04(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 255, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 486, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1146, Sec. 11.03, eff. September 1, 2009.
I'm trying to follow this on my phone between meetings and haven't had a chance to sit down at my computer to do much research.
Your condescending response let's me know that you are NOT the type of instructor I'll seek out for my renewal.
Thank you for the response nonetheless.
My entire point is that if mental illness is used to deny someone the right to own a gun, the illnesses and the degree to which someone has those illnesses needs to be well stipulated and not open to subjective opinion of any one doctor or bureaucrat.
Since I found the actual language of the subject bill, I see defining the illnesses are not applicable to this particular bill.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:21 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/113/hr329
Here's the actual text of the bill. Not sure I have too much problem with it. Seems like it its in line with what LaPierre said early on after Sandy Hook.
Here's the actual text of the bill. Not sure I have too much problem with it. Seems like it its in line with what LaPierre said early on after Sandy Hook.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:46 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
Mr. Cotton, I agree with what you say. I believe strengthening the laws already on the books and better more consistent enforcement of the laws while prosecuting those that break the law is fine. My concern is that I would like to see the actual bill as it is proposed and am having trouble locating it.
If in fact, the law only applies to those that have been "adjudicated" as being mentally defective or having a mental illness that precludes them from owning or carrying a gun, I can live with that.
As an insurance agent and dealing with quite a few clients, I've come to realize many people are taking prescription medication for depression,ADD, anxiety, panic attack and other issues that do not necessarily make them a danger to themselves or others. This along with the move to electronic medical records, it would be very easy in the near future to mine the medical records data and determine many people are disqualified from owning firearms or having a CHL.
Any direction you can provide would be appreciated.
Edited: add CHL
If in fact, the law only applies to those that have been "adjudicated" as being mentally defective or having a mental illness that precludes them from owning or carrying a gun, I can live with that.
As an insurance agent and dealing with quite a few clients, I've come to realize many people are taking prescription medication for depression,ADD, anxiety, panic attack and other issues that do not necessarily make them a danger to themselves or others. This along with the move to electronic medical records, it would be very easy in the near future to mine the medical records data and determine many people are disqualified from owning firearms or having a CHL.
Any direction you can provide would be appreciated.
Edited: add CHL
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 3:06 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
Can you help me out by providing a link to what you are referring?K.Mooneyham wrote:I cannot understand how folks cannot see the word ADJUDICATED in there. Not just because a doctor said so, or on some "list", but after going through COURT. I vehemently oppose simply slapping someone on a "list" or letting a doc make the call without any checks and balances.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:43 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
Keith B wrote:Uh, this is defined in Texas, NOT for Federal. The background check is Federal. You need to make sure you are quoting before you say it has ALREADY been defined.KaiserB wrote:mojo84 wrote:What are the disqualifying mental illnesses and who determines who has those disqualifying illnesses? Does it matter to what degree someone must be ill with one of the illnesses to disqualify them from gun ownership?
These details need to be ironed out before an informed decision can be made about whether this is a good idea or not. We don't need another pass it so we can find out what is in it law.
That has ALREADY been defined. 30 seconds on Google will get you this:
(d) For purposes of Subsection (a)(7), a person is incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person:
(1) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition that causes or is likely to cause substantial impairment in judgment, mood, perception, impulse control, or intellectual ability;
(2) suffers from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subdivision (1) that:
(A) is in remission but is reasonably likely to redevelop at a future time; or
(B) requires continuous medical treatment to avoid redevelopment;
(3) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician, determined by a review board or similar authority, or declared by a court to be incompetent to manage the person's own affairs; or
(4) has entered in a criminal proceeding a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.
(e) The following constitutes evidence that a person has a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d)(1):
(1) involuntary psychiatric hospitalization;
(2) psychiatric hospitalization;
(3) inpatient or residential substance abuse treatment in the preceding five-year period;
(4) diagnosis in the preceding five-year period by a licensed physician that the person is dependent on alcohol, a controlled substance, or a similar substance; or
(5) diagnosis at any time by a licensed physician that the person suffers or has suffered from a psychiatric disorder or condition consisting of or relating to:
(A) schizophrenia or delusional disorder;
(B) bipolar disorder;
(C) chronic dementia, whether caused by illness, brain defect, or brain injury;
(D) dissociative identity disorder;
(E) intermittent explosive disorder; or
(F) antisocial personality disorder.
(f) Notwithstanding Subsection (d), a person who has previously been diagnosed as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d) or listed in Subsection (e) is not because of that disorder or condition incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person provides the department with a certificate from a licensed physician whose primary practice is in the field of psychiatry stating that the psychiatric disorder or condition is in remission and is not reasonably likely to develop at a future time.
(g) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2), a person who is at least 18 years of age but not yet 21 years of age is eligible for a license to carry a concealed handgun if the person:
(1) is a member or veteran of the United States armed forces, including a member or veteran of the reserves or national guard;
(2) was discharged under honorable conditions, if discharged from the United States armed forces, reserves, or national guard; and
(3) meets the other eligibility requirements of Subsection (a) except for the minimum age required by federal law to purchase a handgun.
(h) The issuance of a license to carry a concealed handgun to a person eligible under Subsection (g) does not affect the person's ability to purchase a handgun or ammunition under federal law.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 10.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 9.03(a), 9.04(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 255, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 486, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1146, Sec. 11.03, eff. September 1, 2009.
Keith, I was just reading this for fourth time and trying to ascertain what you just mentioned. You beat me to it.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:24 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
KaiserB wrote:mojo84 wrote:What are the disqualifying mental illnesses and who determines who has those disqualifying illnesses? Does it matter to what degree someone must be ill with one of the illnesses to disqualify them from gun ownership?
These details need to be ironed out before an informed decision can be made about whether this is a good idea or not. We don't need another pass it so we can find out what is in it law.
That has ALREADY been defined. 30 seconds on Google will get you this:
(d) For purposes of Subsection (a)(7), a person is incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person:
(1) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition that causes or is likely to cause substantial impairment in judgment, mood, perception, impulse control, or intellectual ability;
(2) suffers from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subdivision (1) that:
(A) is in remission but is reasonably likely to redevelop at a future time; or
(B) requires continuous medical treatment to avoid redevelopment;
(3) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician, determined by a review board or similar authority, or declared by a court to be incompetent to manage the person's own affairs; or
(4) has entered in a criminal proceeding a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.
(e) The following constitutes evidence that a person has a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d)(1):
(1) involuntary psychiatric hospitalization;
(2) psychiatric hospitalization;
(3) inpatient or residential substance abuse treatment in the preceding five-year period;
(4) diagnosis in the preceding five-year period by a licensed physician that the person is dependent on alcohol, a controlled substance, or a similar substance; or
(5) diagnosis at any time by a licensed physician that the person suffers or has suffered from a psychiatric disorder or condition consisting of or relating to:
(A) schizophrenia or delusional disorder;
(B) bipolar disorder;
(C) chronic dementia, whether caused by illness, brain defect, or brain injury;
(D) dissociative identity disorder;
(E) intermittent explosive disorder; or
(F) antisocial personality disorder.
(f) Notwithstanding Subsection (d), a person who has previously been diagnosed as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d) or listed in Subsection (e) is not because of that disorder or condition incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person provides the department with a certificate from a licensed physician whose primary practice is in the field of psychiatry stating that the psychiatric disorder or condition is in remission and is not reasonably likely to develop at a future time.
(g) Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2), a person who is at least 18 years of age but not yet 21 years of age is eligible for a license to carry a concealed handgun if the person:
(1) is a member or veteran of the United States armed forces, including a member or veteran of the reserves or national guard;
(2) was discharged under honorable conditions, if discharged from the United States armed forces, reserves, or national guard; and
(3) meets the other eligibility requirements of Subsection (a) except for the minimum age required by federal law to purchase a handgun.
(h) The issuance of a license to carry a concealed handgun to a person eligible under Subsection (g) does not affect the person's ability to purchase a handgun or ammunition under federal law.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 10.01(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 62, Sec. 9.03(a), 9.04(a), eff. Sept. 1, 1999; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 255, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
Amended by:
Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 486, Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2005.
Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1146, Sec. 11.03, eff. September 1, 2009.
I'm trying to follow this on my phone between meetings and haven't had a chance to sit down at my computer to do much research.
Your condescending response let's me know that you are NOT the type of instructor I'll seek out for my renewal.
Thank you for the response nonetheless.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:46 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
What are the disqualifying mental illnesses and who determines who has those disqualifying illnesses? Does it matter to what degree someone must be ill with one of the illnesses to disqualify them from gun ownership?
These details need to be ironed out before an informed decision can be made about whether this is a good idea or not. We don't need another pass it so we can find out what is in it law.
These details need to be ironed out before an informed decision can be made about whether this is a good idea or not. We don't need another pass it so we can find out what is in it law.
- Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:48 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
- Replies: 127
- Views: 21155
Re: Graham introduces background check bill with NRA backing
Haven't had a chance to read up on it in detail. What is the definition of mental illnesses? Mild to moderate depression that is controlled by medication or counseling, ADD, work related stress, grieving from the loss of a loved one, financial trouble stress.
What about people that contact their employer provided employ assistance program?
Where do they draw the line?
What about people that contact their employer provided employ assistance program?
Where do they draw the line?