TexasCHLforum.com

mojo84

twomillenium wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
twomillenium wrote:In a court of law, common sense has little to do with it, since common sense is a variable. Just look at the news.
I said common sense and where belts are designed to be worn.
I know.

Then you should know that common sense and the design of the belt together make it obvious, even in a court of law.

mojo84

twomillenium wrote:In a court of law, common sense has little to do with it, since common sense is a variable. Just look at the news.

I said common sense and where belts are designed to be worn.

mojo84

twomillenium wrote:Just curious where does it define a belt must be around the waist or pants? A belt can go around any part of the body just as a strap can go around the waist. Could it be the reason for "belt" was to make sure the open holster was secured to the body? Or could it be that not much thought was given at all. I think the next legislature will have a lot to clean up.

I think it's defined by common sense and where belts are designed to be worn. Do really need to have everything spelled out for us?

mojo84

I think drop leg holsters, while meeting the legal requirement, look to tacticool to be openly worn by non-cops as their regular mode of carry. I don't even like the idea of cops wearing them as their daily duty holster.

I may be in the minority but that's just my thought in it.

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 5 matches

Re: Open Carry Belt Holster...

Re: Open Carry Belt Holster...

Re: Open Carry Belt Holster...

Re: Open Carry Belt Holster...

Re: Open Carry Belt Holster...