TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:

mreed911 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:Tell me to knock it off if I'm off-base on this one, but maybe someone wants to slap a "gunbuster" sticker on their door to keep guns out instead of posting the proper signage per the law? Just a thought...

Then it has no legal bearing on anyone with an LTC.

Carry concealed and there's ZERO violation.

Carry open and there's violation only if you fail to leave after having been given proper notice.

Well, I know that, but maybe someone isn't happy to have to put up "big ugly signs", that's all I'm saying.

It doesn't matter if they are happy or not. They still need to follow the law for the sign to have the force of law.

I've been here on this forum for awhile now, I understand how it works, and I agree 100%. I think maybe the OP isn't happy to have to put up big ugly signs, and wanted to complain here to the rest of us about their unhappiness.

I know you've been here a while. That is why I was surprised by your comment which portrayed an apparent lack of understanding.

I understood k.mooneyham's post to mean what he said......not that HE agrees with the OP, but that he speculates that the OP is motivated by not wanting to have to post a compliant sign at his own business. OTH, I assumed that OP lives in Texas. Apparently Keith B knows differently.......in which case OP is trying to make Oklahoma law apply in Texas.......which is no different logically than if I were to insist that my LTC is valid in California.

K.Mooneyham wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:

mreed911 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:Tell me to knock it off if I'm off-base on this one, but maybe someone wants to slap a "gunbuster" sticker on their door to keep guns out instead of posting the proper signage per the law? Just a thought...

Then it has no legal bearing on anyone with an LTC.

Carry concealed and there's ZERO violation.

Carry open and there's violation only if you fail to leave after having been given proper notice.

Well, I know that, but maybe someone isn't happy to have to put up "big ugly signs", that's all I'm saying.

It doesn't matter if they are happy or not. They still need to follow the law for the sign to have the force of law.

I've been here on this forum for awhile now, I understand how it works, and I agree 100%. I think maybe the OP isn't happy to have to put up big ugly signs, and wanted to complain here to the rest of us about their unhappiness.

K.Mooneyham wrote:

mreed911 wrote:

K.Mooneyham wrote:Tell me to knock it off if I'm off-base on this one, but maybe someone wants to slap a "gunbuster" sticker on their door to keep guns out instead of posting the proper signage per the law? Just a thought...

Then it has no legal bearing on anyone with an LTC.

Carry concealed and there's ZERO violation.

Carry open and there's violation only if you fail to leave after having been given proper notice.

Well, I know that, but maybe someone isn't happy to have to put up "big ugly signs", that's all I'm saying.

K.Mooneyham wrote:Tell me to knock it off if I'm off-base on this one, but maybe someone wants to slap a "gunbuster" sticker on their door to keep guns out instead of posting the proper signage per the law? Just a thought...