Baldeagle, How can one take being called a "bozo" any other way than a personal attack or insult. Contrary to your comment he specifically included OC supporters.
In spite of his insult, I directed my respoonse to the issues and actions. Justifying a personal attack because of an emotional state of mind is not productive. I even acknowledge his frustration.
Search found 6 matches
Return to “Another casualty of Open Carry”
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:59 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
Re: Another casualty of Open Carry
VM, I hear you and saw your other posts.
It's just that there is quite a few that are lashing out blaming open carry itself and not the morons that put it in such a negative light. Yeah, there have been some negative reaction by companies, but, it is irrational and illogical for them to decide now that concealed carry is bad and should be banned. It just doesn't make sense to me.
It's just that there is quite a few that are lashing out blaming open carry itself and not the morons that put it in such a negative light. Yeah, there have been some negative reaction by companies, but, it is irrational and illogical for them to decide now that concealed carry is bad and should be banned. It just doesn't make sense to me.
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:20 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
Re: Another casualty of Open Carry
VMI77 wrote:It happened with my employer too and my company is about as conservative as a company can get. I don't think they were looking for an excuse as CC had been explicitly endorsed by the company for years. I think he's right that 30.07 precipitated lawyer involvement and lawyer involvement led to banning everything...just in case.CoffeeNut wrote:How is it the fault of those that support open carry that your place of employment is now posted not only 30.07 but 30.06 as well? When a business takes advantage of something like open carry in order to fully express their anti-gun views I don't necessarily blame those that are for open carry, rather I blame the business that decided they could get away with finally expressing their views. When I can go to a liberal place like Trader Joes and see a 30.07 sign right next to a sign saying CC is good to go it really makes me think that those now posting both were just anxiously waiting for an opportunity to post without backlash. Can we blame OC for this? Sure, but I'd rather redirect the blame onto the businesses that would rather see patrons die in their store than have someone defend themselves, otherwise the pro-gun movement in Texas is just going to tear itself apart.Bullitt wrote:Oh! And I forgot to mention we are having layoffs because oil prices are in the _______, now more than ever is when CHL is needed. Thanks Bozos!Bullitt wrote:My employer just announced 30.07 signage and also 30.06 signage since all this open carry crap brought it to their attention. To those of you living in the "conceptual" world instead of the "practical" world, THANKS FOR NOTHING!
If you feel your place of employment is now at greater risk of a shooting from a disgruntled employee maybe you should voice your complaints to management. What's the harm in doing so especially when they've already got legal signs up?
I don't think the risk of workplace violence at my place of employment is any different that it always has been (neglecting possible acts of terrorism which I consider unlikely) but should one occur my ability to defend myself has definitely been greatly diminished.
Blaming the concept of open carry is like blaming the gun for violence. It's the few loudmouth morons that brought a negative light on it and the lawyers and execs that are making illogical and irrational decisions by banning concealed carry at this point in time.
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:15 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
Re: Another casualty of Open Carry
Bullitt wrote:I'm not accountable to you for what I discuss with my employer. However, they will be getting some healthy advice from me on the matter. Fortunately I am a manager and will be listened to, though I doubt I will get my way. That's not the point...mojo84 wrote:Since you indicated you are also frustrated with your employer, have you brought your concerns to their attention and addresses them as bozos?
The point is once again you (or others) are conceptualizing based on what you feel is right or wrong, instead of living in the practicalities of the real world in having to deal with this issue. If open carry results in even one restriction of concealed carry, which it has, then the passing of open carry has served no purpose whatsoever. It is a Pyrric victory, and y'all have egg over your faces. Just admit it has been nothing more than a law passed to satisfy the egos of those who wanted to advertise that they carry a gun. It was stupid. THANKS A LOT!
Are you always this emotional and angry? Saying if one place restricts carry because open carry passed is a rational and logical as saying all guns should be banned if it saves just one life.
Open carry is not the cause of your employer posting a 30.06 sign. It is the result of a few loud and obnoxious morons bringing negative attention to the carrying of guns and companies making irrational decisions that they now need to to ban concealed carry.
Lumping everyone in the bozo group is not productive. When you do that you come across as irrational as the people for whom you work.
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:21 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
Re: Another casualty of Open Carry
Lumping everyone in with the open carry goons just because we support open carry is wrong, inappropriate, offensive and obnoxious. Your perspective is not everyone's. I live in reality every day and my reality does not involve me being a corporate minion.Bullitt wrote:First of all, who says I am not frustrated with my employer over this? Again, you are living in the conceptual world, not the practical world. Second, corporations have lawyers. They get wind of 30.07 and then decide they better put up 30.06 as well just to cover their asses. These are corporations we are talking about, and if you think they are Conservative because they are oil companies, guess again amigo.mojo84 wrote:
I understand your frustration. Other than just because carrying of weapons was brought to light, why did your company decide 30.06 signs were needed at this point? There is a pretty good 20 year track record that shows they are not needed for improved safety.
The passage of open carry has brought the signs to the forefront and the open carry goons did public relations damage. However, it seems your employer is making an irrational decision by deciding now to put up 30.06 signs. Shouldn't you be more frustrated with your employer instead?
Since you indicated you are also frustrated with your employer, have you brought your concerns to their attention and addresses them as bozos?
- Fri Jan 15, 2016 10:43 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Another casualty of Open Carry
- Replies: 213
- Views: 71967
Re: Another casualty of Open Carry
I understand your frustration. Other than just because carrying of weapons was brought to light, why did your company decide 30.06 signs were needed at this point? There is a pretty good 20 year track record that shows they are not needed for improved safety.Bullitt wrote:My employer just announced 30.07 signage and also 30.06 signage since all this open carry crap brought it to their attention. To those of you living in the "conceptual" world instead of the "practical" world, THANKS FOR NOTHING!
The passage of open carry has brought the signs to the forefront and the open carry goons did public relations damage. However, it seems your employer is making an irrational decision by deciding now to put up 30.06 signs. Shouldn't you be more frustrated with your employer instead?