Closer to 300 that 30 by my count. Maybe it was "surpressing fire" (firing just to keep the enemy's heads down while you sneak up on them.)Dave2 wrote:Yeah, I'm shocked the guy's still alive after, what was it, 30 shots?jimlongley wrote:What I can't figure out is why, with all of the shots fired, the cops didn't GET them.JALLEN wrote: . . . These guys are lucky the cops got 'em. It could have been much worse. They could have been captured by a crew from CNN, MSPMS and New York Times and questioned until they spilled their guts about everything, then misquoted about evverything. Paparazzi take no prisoners! Look how uncle and sisters were treated.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Anyone a little concerned?”
- Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:34 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Anyone a little concerned?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5192
Re: Anyone a little concerned?
- Sat Apr 20, 2013 9:52 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Anyone a little concerned?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5192
Re: Anyone a little concerned?
What I can't figure out is why, with all of the shots fired, the cops didn't GET them.JALLEN wrote: . . . These guys are lucky the cops got 'em. It could have been much worse. They could have been captured by a crew from CNN, MSPMS and New York Times and questioned until they spilled their guts about everything, then misquoted about evverything. Paparazzi take no prisoners! Look how uncle and sisters were treated.
- Sat Apr 20, 2013 6:46 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Anyone a little concerned?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5192
Re: Anyone a little concerned?
From my point of view, the administration merely ignored the rules on the assumption that everyone would be in favor of it due to the circumstance.