Re-iteration of original declaration. Statement of demonstrably false information, with added sources which, when traced, all quote original flawed study.LikesShinyThings wrote:Counter point to your declaration that you must be right. Also, nitpicking technical minor quibble blown out of all proportion to the original point being picked at.JSThane wrote:Pointless reply to post on first page. Obvious lack of understanding of the original issue. Total and willful ignorance of discussion that followed.
[Quote provided, off topic to original issue and to reply]
Ad-hominem generalization about group of people not even mentioned in post.
Summation of reply, longer than actual reply.
Declaration that I must be right, as my logic is in-arguable.
Statement which obliquely implies any disagreement is demonstrative of mental illness.
Closing statement which inadvertently disproves entire line of reasoning, then re-iteration of "I must be right."