rp_photo wrote:We always hear that businesses post 30.06 signs in order to reduce liability, but it seems to me that should a CHL be harmed on the property as a result of complying, that would be a greater liability and moral burden than any actions of a CHL who was legally carrying.
In other words, wouldn't the business be better off not getting involved and let Texas law decide whether customers can carry?
I agree with you. I think that is one resun we dont see the signs very offen.