Yup. That is confusing. I think, think I say, that passage refers to:C-dub wrote: ↑Fri Jan 17, 2020 7:15 pm OUCH!!!
I am a little confused by the issue surrounding the typical "no guns" sign. The silhouette inside a red circle with a slash through the gun. Are they saying it is similar to or the same as a 30.06 and 30.07 even though it doesn't have the wording to accompany it?
if so, the quote in ELB's post is merely stating the slashed handgun sign is indeed a sign that violates S.B. 273.The trial court denied the Attorney General’s motion for summary judgment and most of the City’s plea. CR.388. In a letter, the court explained its decision grant- ing the City’s plea with respect to the interdictory circle posted at the entrance to City Hall. First, the court concluded that the universal sign of prohibition—a hand- gun inside of a circle with a line slashed through it—was not a “sign” or “commu- nication” for purposes of § 411.209(a) because it did not contain specific wording.