So, since he did an interview and said he hopes it covers concealed carry as well, does this qualify as oral notice? If you watched the video? I assume this is pretty much untested but would like to get the opinions of the lawyers on the forum. If I am not legally welcome to carry in their stores, I most certainly want to know.
(1:45 in to this video if you want to see it " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;)
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Starbucks folds to antis”
- Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:14 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks folds to antis
- Replies: 171
- Views: 29746
- Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:20 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks folds to antis
- Replies: 171
- Views: 29746
- Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:16 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks folds to antis
- Replies: 171
- Views: 29746
Re: Starbucks folds to antis
And Starbucks owns the next closest shop to me, settles best...awesome
- Wed Sep 18, 2013 12:49 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Starbucks folds to antis
- Replies: 171
- Views: 29746
Re: Starbucks folds to antis
ummmm....no it doesnt
(A) a card or other document on which is written language
identical to the following: “Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code
(trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person
licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code
(concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed
handgun”;
i am still torn on how i feel about this
(A) a card or other document on which is written language
identical to the following: “Pursuant to Section 30.06, Penal Code
(trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun), a person
licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code
(concealed handgun law), may not enter this property with a concealed
handgun”;
i am still torn on how i feel about this