Not needing a CHL at all is the ultimate goal so wouldn't that be a positive?! Licensing does nothing, so bring on unlicensed carry.K5GU wrote:Okay. How about this then. It could be that folks don't see a CHL as necessary if they believe the minimum standards don't prove anything anyway?WildBill wrote:The CHL is not a certification. The written and shooting portions of the class are minimum standards to issue a CHL.K5GU wrote:It could be that folks don't see a CHL as necessary if they believe the certification process doesn't prove anything anyway?WildBill wrote:I am not going to flame anyone, but it's strange how many people on the forum say that they support "constitutional carry", i.e. no license required, but think the proficiency test is too lenient.
I think that it is every person's responsibility to become safe and proficient with their particular firearm, but that is their own personal choice.
A person who doesn't learn and practice with their firearms will find this out too late.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Is The CHL Proficiency Test Sufficient?”
- Tue Mar 31, 2015 1:16 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Is The CHL Proficiency Test Sufficient?
- Replies: 83
- Views: 10364