TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 11:35 pm https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 93691.html

Trump sort of uninvites women’s soccer team.

Apparently none wanted to come anyway.

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2019 9:35 pm https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/07/us/t ... gures.html

New York Times snags Trump’s old tax returns.

Apparently during a time when he was losing a lot of money.

Are there laws against possessing a person’s tax returns without their permission?

philip964 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:33 am https://www.vox.com/world/2019/3/21/182 ... an-heights

Trump recognizes Golan Heights as Israel’s.

Trump may have just sealed the Jewish vote in 2020.

philip964 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 10:16 pm https://news.yahoo.com/warren-returning ... ction.html

Warren predicts Trump will be behind bars in 2020.

I predict Warren will not be President in 2020.

bbhack wrote: ↑Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:31 am General Flynn will not spend one second behind bars. I mention this because his name keeps coming up as someone who has been caught in the Russia trap. I do not know why he plead guilty. Could be for money reasons. Could be for other reasons.

General Flynn will not spend one second behind bars. There is a judge who is in deep trouble. Another judge is very angry. The first is Contreras, the second is Sullivan.

If you disagree, I'll wager $100. This is not against forum rules, although I'm sure it will be soon.

The Mueller plea deal with General Flynn, filed on 1 December, 2017, is explicit : it says that on 24 January 2017, Flynn lied to the FBI (Strzok) by saying that he had not talked with Ambassador Kislyak about possible sanctions relief, when in fact he had.

However, there is a complication. Prior to 1 December, 2017, Strzok and the other FBI agent had said the opposite - that Flynn had told them the truth. Even James Comey has admitted the same, to Congress. In other words, the General was open with the FBI that he had been communicating with Kislyak about possible sanctions relief, a normal and legal act by an NSA for an incoming administration.

So how does General Flynn telling the truth on 24 January, 2017 become him lying to the FBI on 1 December, 2017? Simple : the ‘facts’ underlying the communications were changed.

Someone, almost certainly Andrew McCabe and Peter Strzok, re-wrote the original late January 2017 FD 302, to falsely portray General Flynn as saying that he had not spoken with ambassador Kislyak. When was the 302 altered? Footnote 23 (my bold) of last night’s memorandum provides the answer:

anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:31 am ...
You really need to get out more.

philbo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:14 am

bbhack wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 12:55 am

philbo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 12:39 am

bbhack wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:24 pm... but I'm not interested.

And that sums up what's wrong with the silent GOP who have acquiesced and enabled the amoral activities of the current administration. If the story doesn't fit your preconceived narrative you just don't want to be bored with anything more than what you already believe to be true. To borrow from above:
Bottom line, what tRump says for the next two years became a lot less important after the midterms. It seems that votes do matter, and apparently our president seems agitated he may not get his way any longer.

And you address none of the points. I won.

A bunch of conclusory statements without any underlying reasoning or supporting facts is not a making a point. When you make a point I'll be sure to respond. Until you can do that, "I'm not interested."

philbo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 10, 2018 12:39 am

bbhack wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:24 pm... but I'm not interested.

And that sums up what's wrong with the silent GOP who have acquiesced and enabled the amoral activities of the current administration. If the story doesn't fit your preconceived narrative you just don't want to be bored with anything more than what you already believe to be true. To borrow from above:
Bottom line, what tRump says for the next two years became a lot less important after the midterms. It seems that votes do matter, and apparently our president seems agitated he may not get his way any longer.

philbo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 9:47 pm

rotor wrote: ↑Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:07 pmNot saying there was "collusion" but if there was what statute would have been violated? Is collusion illegal?

Trump and his surrogates have repeatedly sought to delegitimize the special counsel’s investigation by saying there was “no collusion” and calling the special counsel’s probe a “witch hunt.” By focusing on the word "collusion" one might miss the fact that the convictions of trumps former associates and indictments of more than 2 dozen russians has instead relied on statutes containing words such as “conspiracy,” “obstruction of justice” and making “false statements.”

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 06, 2018 4:59 pm https://apnews.com/705ae08bd6f44012b564b0f37b5ca089

Big day for Trump and his agenda.

Big day for The Anti Trump movement and their agenda.

Voting machines malfunction all over the country.

Mine “seemed” fine.

But I prefer punch cards to electronic magic.

The president’s proclivity to twist data and fabricate stories is on full display at his rallies. He has his greatest hits: 120 times he had falsely said he passed the biggest tax cut in history, 80 times he has asserted that the U.S. economy today is the best in history and 74 times he has falsely said his border wall is already being built. (Congress has allocated only $1.6 billion for fencing, but Trump also frequently mentioned additional funding that has not yet been appropriated.)