Heartland Patriot wrote:THIS incident is why you should carry everywhere it is not ILLEGAL to carry. That means, for those of you who say that you won't carry past "Gunbuster" or other similar type unenforceable signs, carry EVERYWHERE that isn't either Federal property, properly placarded per 30.06, or off-limits by other LEGAL signage or locations under THE LAW. Or, alternatively, don't go into the place at all but stay armed. There will never be any proof of it, but it is POSSIBLE that SOMEONE let the MOVIE THEATER'S policy of "no firearms" stop them from carrying. I'd rather operate on the idea that its better to have and not need, than need and not have...I've slacked off lately, carrying "off-body" in a case because its "easier". No more, unless I HAVE TO.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado shootin”
- Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:53 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado shootin
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6519
Re: Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado sho
- Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:12 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado shootin
- Replies: 35
- Views: 6519
Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado shootin
Gun control legislation unlikely in wake of Colorado shooting.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la ... 0563.story" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Despite events such as the massacre at Columbine High School in 1999, the Beltway sniper spree in 2002, the shooting at Virginia Tech University in 2007 and the Fort Hood, Texas, shooting in 2009, support for gun control has steadily declined throughout the country, with Americans increasingly satisfied with the status quo of gun rights.