Thanks for taking my comments as positively as you did. I hoped that would be the case.NotThere wrote:Thanks for the comments. I usually just read posts, but this has come up in several of my circles and I was running through my knowledge and needed the feedback. Appreciate the corrections, and apologize for the bad use of grammar on my part. Is it protocol to take down a post that's shot full of holes, or leave it up as a lesson?
I was not aware that private property owners can arbitrarily post a sign and it be enforceable. I thought the law allows for CHL holders to carry everywhere, unless a business falls under one of the provisions made for a church, school, hospital, 51%, etc., that exempts them from people carrying on their premises. Thus the terms "claims a 30.06 exemption". I have seen the arguments on the content of the sign and I'm not one to push an issue there.... Guess I didn't ask the right questions at my last renewal class.
That's why we're all here though - to learn as much as we can from others! Lord knows that I learn here every time I visit.)