TexasCHLforum.com

C-dub wrote:Haven't read this thread in about 60 pages. Did I miss anything?

No. Some people still think the man who got kicked out of school multiple times for drugs and possession of stolen property probably started the fight. Other people still blame the local resident who started it by getting out of his car while it was on a street inside the gated subdivision where he lived.

baldeagle wrote:You're serious? TM had a cut knuckle. GZ had a broken nose, lacerations to his face, two cuts on the back on his head and his blood all over his clothes. He had no damage at all to his hands, and TM had no injuries other than the cut knuckle and the gun shot wound. If it isn't clear to you who assaulted whom then I have no idea what to say. Apparently evidence is meaningless.

That's their story and they're sticking to it. Don't confuse them with the facts.

jocat54 wrote:There is only one side to this story being told by someone involved...his....we will never know the other side involved. With no one to oppose his story first hand, well he can say what he wants.

There's only one side of the story being told by someone who knows what happened. His story has remained the same, even as more evidence has come to light, and fits that evidence pretty good.

Trayvon's side of the story is being told by people who weren't there, and who keep changing their theories to try to prop up their story. That doesn't sound like a very reliable side of the story when it doesn't stand on its own as new facts become known. They remind me of Ptolemaic astronomers.