TexasCHLforum.com

you know, I saw a little pamphlet at a range that I frequent.
sounds pretty cool, but my thought is, if the Castle Doctrine passes, it might make it kind of redundant (to a point, I meant).
if the offending party is negated in their ability to frivilously sue, then a severe portion of the need has been nullified.
there are plenty of other scenarios that this type of protection might help, but I'm certainly not going to jump all over something that will potentially take some of my miniscule apropriation for shooting, ammo, and MORE GUNS!!!!
just my 2pence