Well anyone can carry a concealed firearm in their vehicle at this time if they meet the requirements set forth in the motorist protection act and no license is required. I might agree that some sort of safety course should be taken much like the hunters safety course, but a license should not be needed for a Right.Oldgringo wrote:I agree with Chas. and The Annoyed Man if they said what I think they said.
An "in your face" open carry position is not in our long term best interests in the larger scheme of things. As TAM suggests, open carry, should it ever pass, must have some qualification/license attached to it, IMHO. Would you want everybody running around in a car/truck without some qualifying process? Yeah, yeah...I know, the constitution doesn't mention cars and trucks but that was then and this is now.
The more I think about it, the less I'm comfortable with the thought that every nut case out there could be running around, unbridled, with a loaded gun on his/her hip. Have y'all ever gone to a WalMart on Saturday?
My 2¢ worth
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Open-Carry is a right, but concealed carry is not?”
- Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:54 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Open-Carry is a right, but concealed carry is not?
- Replies: 52
- Views: 8668
Re: Open-Carry is a right, but concealed carry is not?
- Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:29 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Open-Carry is a right, but concealed carry is not?
- Replies: 52
- Views: 8668
Re: Open-Carry is a right, but concealed carry is not?
Since we have the right to keep and bear arms per the 2A 
, it should be the individuals choice on how they want to carry without interference 
from government entities.
, it should be the individuals choice on how they want to carry without interference from government entities.