Supposedly they knew they were in trouble and dropped the emergency ballast to come up, but they imploded too fast.powerboatr wrote: ↑Thu Jun 22, 2023 10:26 pmYES
it is despite what you hear on the budget floor
man made sounds are very very different from nature.
a crushing collapse , would be very noisy in the scheme of things
a leak in a drop or a spray in a submarine...maybe they could fix it, but its not a submarine.
its a really thin walled bubble and a leak would go from HEY its wet, to HEY we are dead extremely fast
not so sure about the sudden HEAT from imploding, but i can see it from a science standpoint
lots of energy to displace really fast
think boat propeller cavitation and the bubbles that eat at a prop surface
those people probably only had time to think Oh, if at all
a shame
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site”
- Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:17 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
- Replies: 32
- Views: 10125
Re: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
- Thu Jun 22, 2023 9:44 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
- Replies: 32
- Views: 10125
Re: Missing tourist submarine at Titanic wreck site
"The US Navy’s undersea listening system is good enough for the operators to hear the difference between an implosion and an explosion."
It was that good in the 70s when my uncle heard a sub implode with it.
It was that good in the 70s when my uncle heard a sub implode with it.