Does anyone dissagree that the right to keep and bear arms is a choice???
Some choose to do so, and do not necessarily force others to do so; yet those that choose to NOT to keep and bear arms are generally unfettered in infringing upon "our" choice...
So, when we champion the idea about removing an infringement upon our ability to keep and bear arms, against people who choose to not exercise that right, and they are the ones who feel compelled to manufacture an environment that is (in their crase opinion) a level playing field...I choose to side on the part of passing a law that removes a private entities ability to criminalize, or allow them to put your life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness at extreme risk...And make them liable for any injuries or deaths as a result of their position...
A question you have to ask is this...
"How is my (and others) ability "and choice" (licensed or not) in carrying a firearm for lawful, self-defensive purposes, anywhere I deem it personally and reasonably necessary to do so, impacting anyone else, whether they agree with me or not in doing so?"
(I'm waiting for the folks who will ask me, "Well that's just fine and dandy Steve, what happens when you reasonably determine that discharging that weapon in a self defensive act WILL impact others that are not exercising their right to keep and bear arms?")
I'll wait to see if anyone will bite on this one...
