TexasCHLforum.com

boomerang wrote:

stevie_d_64 wrote:Go back and look at the code, and see what it says about "hospitals"...

Especially the part of 46.035 that says "subsections (b)(4), (b)(5), (b)(6), and (c) do not apply if the actor was not given effective notice under Section 30.06"

"effective notice" being another wide ranging form of exploitation...The sign could actually be non-compliant to the statute, but if the intent is there, "effective notice" is given in the owners opinion...And might not boad well for you as the "testus casus" in a court of law...

So until those that are able to post the 30.06 are put on notice to post the sign properly in all aspects of the law, and penalties for non-compliance are levied, then I see this being more of a burden on us...As it always has been...

I think the situation stinks, and this issue has bothered me from day one...

If I were to get elected to office this would be a tweek to the law I would sponsor...Just because...

Just my opinion...

Bottom line...

Shhhhhhhhh...Keep it under your hat...

Go back and look at the code, and see what it says about "hospitals"...

The professional building you took your dad to may not be covered under that provision in the law...I stand to be corrected, but thats ok, I do not go to facilities like that very often, and if I do, I am not in the mood usually to carry anyway (I know, some may be shocked by that revelation )