TexasCHLforum.com

The CHLer got no billed by a grand jury. From the limited information available it appears that he a. was much smaller, b. retreated to the back of the bus, c. was followed by the BG, and d. had witnesses, plural, who testified that he acted in self defense. Finally you don't get a no bill if the prosecutor really wants to go after you. So we can infer that the prosecutor thought it was a good shooting. Given all that, why at this point is anyone on this board in doubt???

The witnesses before the grand jury obviously testified to facts that would lead to self defense. I used to ride a bus in my youth and observed that often the same people were on the bus. It may very well be that the BG was well known to the other people on the bus, intimidated them and therefore they recognized and oncoming assault and testified to it.

News reports must not have been accurate then. The guy he shot must have done more than was reported.