That's the question that seems to be getting lost here.bdickens wrote:Who cares? What crime was the mother arrested for?EEllis wrote: She has no right to see a warrant before an arrest. As long as the police were acting in good faith, if they believed they where acting in accordance with the law even if their actions were later found to be contrary to the law then there wouldn't be any criminal liability. If the officers knew and believed they were operating in contrary to the law then there could be several State and Federal Charges. Since here arrest sure seems like it would of been legal, tho we don't know the exact charge, if the warrant had been signed at the time instead of hours later, making sweeping statements about the conduct of the police seems a bit kneejerk right now.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Slaton police arrest woman after request to see warrant”
- Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:04 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Slaton police arrest woman after request to see warrant
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15530
Re: Slaton police arrest woman after request to see warrant
- Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:29 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Slaton police arrest woman after request to see warrant
- Replies: 119
- Views: 15530
Re: Slaton police arrest woman after request to see warrant
Not the only problem Slaton PD has had recently:
http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1106/110602lubbock.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.ice.gov/news/releases/1106/110602lubbock.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Federal grand jury indicts former Slaton, Texas, police officer on child pornography charges
LUBBOCK, Texas – A federal grand jury returned a six-count indictment on Wednesday charging a former Slayton, Texas police officer with various federal child pornography offenses, announced U.S. Attorney James T. Jacks of the Northern District of Texas.