With a legislator pulling stunts like that, who needs enemies when he seems to want to mess things up all by himself? If he wrecks what amounts to a pretty good chance to advance some serious pro-firearms legislation, with Republicans in control of the whole kit and kaboodle, then I hope when his term is up, he finds himself looking for a new line of work.G.A. Heath wrote:The problem is that unlicensed OC could be that poison pill that kills this bill, but that is not what many are worried about. What most folks are worried about is the fact that he reportedly has 162 amendments ready to be offered for this bill and simply voting each and everyone of them down along with killing all the anti-gun amendments will delay this bill to the point that we could see it die. Time is not on our side here, and the extremist positions from both ends are seemingly joining forces to delay this bill to death as well as any other pro-gun measures.SA-TX wrote:Isn't that what Sen. Huffines did and it was voted down soundly?Charles L. Cotton wrote:He'll probably offer it as an amendment to HB910. He stood on the steps of the Capitol and proudly proclaimed that he will try to amend it to every bill dealing with guns.K5GU wrote:I don't know what bill Stickland would be "forcing a vote on" ? His HB 195 is still waiting to go to committee.v7a wrote:'Prince of POO' forces delay in open carry, _______ billsI hope that's a typo, but 6 and 2 are not that close on the keyboard...Rep. Jonathan Stickland, R-Bedford, said he will attempt to force a vote on constitutional carry on Friday. If the House refuses, he said he has 162 amendments he can offer to make the bill less restrictive. Open carry opponents are expected to submit a number of their own amendments, including one to bar open carry by those who have lost their Texas concealed handgun licenses.
And if he really has that many amendments to his bill, that sounds like a re-write is in order.
Chas.
I'm torn between the bird in the hand vs. the two in the bush. I understand strategically that licensed OC is the path of least resistance and seems poised to pass & be signed into law. It is an improvement over current law so I support it. On the other hand, I'm glad that Rep. Stickland and Sen. Huffines are asking the question "Why should the state be involved in this exercise of a constitutional right at all?" If only more lawmakers at all levels asked such questions!
As much of a tough spot as it might put those in who support licensed OC but not unlicensed or constitutional carry, we have a governor who seems to have said he'll sign any of the above. Taking him up on that offer is awfully tempting.
I don't know what I would do as a member but as a Texan and CHLer, the only way I can lose would be for some poison pill to be attached to the bill and not even get licensed OC. If something restoring even more liberty makes it into law, so much the better.
SA-TX
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB910 on House Calendar for 3rd Reading”
- Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:58 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB910 on House Calendar for 3rd Reading
- Replies: 1040
- Views: 163742
Re: HB910 On Apr. 14 House Calendar for 2nd Reading
- Fri Apr 10, 2015 1:49 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB910 on House Calendar for 3rd Reading
- Replies: 1040
- Views: 163742
Re: HB910 On Apr. 14 House Calendar for 2nd Reading
My two (mostly zinc) cents worth: if open carry passes, I'm buying an OWB holster. I'll still wear my untucked shirt over it because I feel that's the prudent thing to do, but I won't have to put up with that IWB stuff anymore.