TexasCHLforum.com

rtschl wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:53 pm Reviving this thread as we don't really know anything, but Patrick Howley, former reporter for Breitbart, Washington Free Beacon and The Daily Caller and assistant editor for The American Spectator dropped a few bombs on Twitter about this yesterday. Not sure of his credibility, but he has broken legitimate stories such as KKK/blackface Virginia Governor Northam and other stories. So take this for what it's worth, but I seem to remember discussion of involvement of the Saudi Royal Family that just all talk of it disappeared.

On Twitter yesterday he revealed the following: If you have an account, go read his tweets as I can't link them all. I wish he would write a full article on it:

I don't know if I buy that explanation. However, I will say that of all the "mass shootings", that is the one that doesn't fit any of the unfortunately standard stuff. Something jacked up happened there, something far beyond one disgruntled or whacked-out guy violently taking his fear or anger out on a group of people in a "gun-free zone". I am still of the opinion that it was a sale of firearms that went bad. The so-called shooter was going to sell a bunch of his rather nice rifles to get a stake up to get into another game, as he was a professional high-stakes gambler who won some/lost some. The deal went sour in some fashion, the potentional buyer(s) snuffed the dude, and the concert crowd was fired upon to create confusion and as a cover-up. Just my opinion, can't prove a thing, but of all the mass shootings, this is the only one that really bothers me beyond the obvious.

Killadocg23 wrote:

Lynyrd wrote:

Captain Matt wrote:

philip964 wrote:Well apparently Native Americans are not the only ones to hold the title of most dead from a mass killing.

Only one massacre can be the most deadly. The rest are runners up.

I think the author is blinded by his own biases. I doubt the MSM ignored the murders he lists because of the skin color of the victims. I think they turn a blind eye to the ones he lists, and other mass killings, because of the killers not because of the victims. The mass shootings being ignored by the MSM were done under the auspices of the government.

The MSM doesn't want to report things like that. If that was common knowledge, it would be obvious that gun control should be targeted at agents of the government, not private citizens. That doesn't fit their narrative.

Another inconvenient truth is that more people are shot and killed in Chicago each month than was killed in Las Vegas on that horrible day. Yet the Chicago killings do not stir the politicians, or the MSM.

What does Chicago have to do with the killing of unarmed people at a Country Music Concert? How can you compare the two? We all know the reason behind all the killings in Chicago. Its drugs,and gang wars. Sad to say but people are already accustomed to that and frankly dont give a crap anymore.This "terrorist",yes he is a darn terrorist,shot and killed and injured innocent people who probably didn't do one darn thing to them. This is why politicians and the MSM are stired over this and not whats happening in Chicago.

No, they are stirred because they follow the same ideology as Rahm Emanuel, Mayor of Chicago and former Chief of Staff to President Obama: "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."