I saw it said that the top-level leftwingers like Soros and Schwab cannot be gotten to, nor can their mouthpiece lackeys like the Hollyweirdos or the news media talking heads at CNN/MSNBC, etc. However, those people don't do their own dirty work. They have to have henchmen to do that stuff, and the "henchmen", they can be gotten to. By gotten to, I do NOT mean violence and I am not advocating for that. However, when one of these leftwing henchmen does whatever foul thing, let everyone know about it. Don't let it get covered up, don't let them hide in the shadows. That's why I like Project Veritas. That team, they go after these leftwingers, like the recent sting on the assistant principal in Connecticut who said he won't hire older people or Catholics (who he considers to be more conservative socially). That guy blatantly violated Federal law, and he's a small enough player that he can't weasel out of it. That's the type who has to get taken down. Alexander Solzhenitsyn spoke about Stalin's "organs of the state", and that IF the people in the Soviet Union had organized against them, there wouldn't have been enough of those organs to continue the reign of terror. Conservatives have to put these leftwingers on blast, as they say, so everyone knows exactly who and what is going on. That's how this all stops.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Sun Sep 04, 2022 11:13 amMy son has a bumper sticker on the back of his truck that says, "Your liberties aren’t dying. They’re being killed by people with names and addresses." (https://antistate.net/collections/liber ... icker-11-5)srothstein wrote: ↑Sun Sep 04, 2022 12:33 amFunny you mention that. Because that is exactly where my worst case scenario is where I will start shooting. I honestly think many people have that exact same line too, which is why I said I would hate to be in any police or military group trying to collect guns.
But I have other set points where I would also start fighting. Many of them are based on things that have happened in history, especially to the Jewish people. I was taught at a very young age that we would "Never Again" allow the holocaust to occur. I took it to heart and still believe it to this day.
And I have thought about my rules of engagement and how I would fight. I have also decided that I would publish my rules so that anyone who supports me will obey them. I know what is an acceptable military target and what is not (and some of them are not what people would think). It would definitely start as what is now called asymmetric warfare (we used to call it guerilla warfare).
Valid military targets include ALL government employees and elected officials, at any level of government, with the exception of medical personnel and chaplains (if they stay unarmed). And if you want to see how bad our government has gotten with interfering in our lives, look at who are government employees. Ironically, I was discussing this with a friend at work and he agreed with this assessment. Then I reminded him that both he and I were government employees right now. He had never considered that part of it, even after someone flew an airplane into a government leased building where our agency has an office (that person's target was the IRS office but it did drive home who is a military target to me).
Any government facility other than hospitals is also a valid target, so why do we have child care facilities in federal buildings? Why is the Army Futures Command, responsible for developing new weapons, located on a college campus that also has a high school on it and child care/development centers on it? Non-governmental facilities that are valid targets include transportation centers, power distribution facilities, water distribution facilities, communication facilities (both media and telephone/internet), financial centers, and any factory - but especially anything that makes war material.
And the worst part of this is that when you start thinking about this, look at what we attacked during World War II. Then look at how vulnerable our country is to an attack right now.
We should act accordingly. The other side has no qualms about doxxing and threatening people to cow them into submission. Our side has had a strange reluctance to do the same. Maybe we should adopt a more proactive attitude about this. And when the commies complain, we’ll simply tell them that THEY taught us that this is a legitimate tactic, and we listened. These commie pieces of fecal matter have gotten away with their crap for way too long.
Among my personal heroes are the men who fought the Battle of Athens. We should all be more like them.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Joe Xiden AKA Brandon- Not guilty by reason of mental disability”
- Sun Sep 04, 2022 11:47 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Joe Xiden AKA Brandon- Not guilty by reason of mental disability
- Replies: 1696
- Views: 1422757
Re: Joe Xiden AKA Brandon
- Thu Jul 21, 2022 10:59 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Joe Xiden AKA Brandon- Not guilty by reason of mental disability
- Replies: 1696
- Views: 1422757
Re: Joe Xiden AKA Brandon
If you want to know the very definition of "The Big Lie", "testing positive for COVID" is that big lie. They have gotten people to simply accept that two things are one and the same, that a RNA test equates to being sick with COVID. Please note, I am NOT a "COVID is fake" guy, and never have been. It is a real disease that has really sickened and really killed people. However, the TEST for it only detects the presence of the virus, not viral load, as in whether any individual has enough to sicken his or her self, or to pass it to others. The test takes small amounts and creates copies until it reaches a threshold. The machine can be programmed for cycles to make copies and a threshold to hit. It was NEVER designed to say that someone has or does not have a particular disease. But hey, these bums have done their dirty work, aided and abetted by a (likely) well-meaning medical culture and, of course, the mass news media machine. It should be done the other way around. Someone is actually sick with symptoms. Then you do a test to confirm or rule out certain things. I would wager by now that a very large percentage of the American populace would "test positive" if the test were ran on them today...and the majority of those folks would not be sick when tested, nor get sick soon after.Paladin wrote: ↑Thu Jul 21, 2022 9:50 am Surprise surprise... the boosters failed, again: "Twice-Boosted" President Biden Tested Positive For COVID-19