I understand the sentiment. But without laws there can be no law abiding citizens. Ironically, the converse can be true as well. All laws are an intrusion onto those that, given the absence of laws, would still behave in an ethical manner. Personally I’d rather refer to ethics than to law abiding since one day I may no longer be law abiding, forced into such a position by the laws imposed, and yet still ethical. My detractors would then mock my prior proclamation of being law abiding.carlson1 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 4:15 pm Obvious there are more people killed my drunk drivers. So the analogy would be then that every car sold should have an ignition interlock device (IID) installed even thou there are people like me that do not even drink.
More intrusion from the government on law abiding citizens.
My point is mainly that the law abiding citizen term is rather dependent on circumstances, ethics isn’t.