Search found 1 match

by MotherBear
Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:34 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: Dangerous shooters at the range
Replies: 49
Views: 11884

Re: Dangerous shooters at the range

mewalke wrote:I am very surprised the ROs didn't eject the person, especially after 3 visits to the shooter and observing the unsafe behavior first-hand. Going forward I will probably call it a day after the FIRST RO visit doesn't correct the behavior. I'd rather be out a $20 range fee instead of leaving in an ambulance or a body bag.
I wonder what the range management would say if you asked for a partial refund of your range fee in situations like that, since their management failed to keep the range safe? My guess is that you wouldn't actually get a refund, but maybe asking would make them think a little harder about how they handle these things. I realize they can't be responsible for the behavior of idiots, but when people continue to be unsafe after multiple interventions from the RO it seems like there's ground to ask them to leave for the safety of all the other customers. And better to ask those people to leave (even if it means refunding their money and losing their business) than have to deal with all of your good customers becoming dissatisfied.

Return to “Dangerous shooters at the range”