TexasCHLforum.com

Memorial Hermann Southwest Professional building seems to be 30.06 compliant, although it is on glass. I guess it conforms to "contrasting" letters.

Memorial Hermann Southeast Professional Building has a generic no guns sign.


Can't comment on the actual respective hospital buildings themselves.

Thanks much for the clarification, Chas! :D

If I walk into Katy Mills mall through the entrance that I referred to, it is not posted. I actually have never entered the mall through any other entrance (seriously). Because I have been "notified" via this, and several other internet forums, does not mean I have been given notice as required under the statute. If one enters a location through an entrance that is not posted, and leaves through same- how is that in violation when the sign has never been seen?

It is not the same principle as a location that is 51%- where the absence of a 51% sign in a prohibited location is not a defense to prosecution...


I wonder if Chas can weigh in on this one....

txinvestigator wrote:Just remember the law does not require that every entrance be posted.

Can you please provide a cite? I checked the statute, and that's not specifically stated, or (to me, anyway), implied.

Thanks.

Last time I was at Katy Mills, the entrance from "the really, really big outdoor sporting goods store" was not posted. Kind of similar to the exception at Sharpstown.

Not sure if that has changed since the last time I was there.


Maybe it's time for a letter writing campaign.

What do you think about adding a section for businessess/locations posted 30.06 (I always wondered if that irony was intentional...) or 30.05? I'm sure TSRA tries, but I wonder how accurate some of their website postings are...


We could then join or begin organized campaigns to get them to understand the folly of their ways by not spending a cent there. The local touch would help as well, I would think.