Russell wrote:I am sure your intentions were good, but the reality is you are actually hurting our advancement as a group by sending letters like that.
I am assuming the bank in question had a "ghostbuster" sign up. That sign has zero legal meaning to CHL holders.
There is no reason to write a company to inform them that their non-legally binding sign has no meaning. There are many, many companies that have ghostbuster signs up for various reasons. The most popular are for insurance reasons, or to appease the liberal sheep that believe the sign is going to save them somehow.
Informing a company that their sign is not a valid 30.06 sign only hurts our cause because now, if they actually meant to restrict CHL holders, they are given a chance to correct it. Guess what? You have now single-handedly created another place CHL holders cannot carry! Woops!
It is not our duty to inform companies of their mistakes who are ignorant of the law.
