TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

louisf1 wrote:

DanD wrote:A truly amazing past 30 minutes. Truly amazing.

What is truly amazing is that walking past a 30:06 sign unintentionally is now going to be a class C misdemeanor.

This is more valuable than open-carry, in my view. 850,000+ CHL benefit from this protection from accidentally entering posted property.

Chas.

Now it has passed.

Passed!!!!!! yeah

Huffines is doing what he should have done last week.

casp625 wrote:

twomillenium wrote:Ellis is not as well spoken as some, but he seems to get his point across.

Ellis just stated he was not going to waste time with this bill... lets hope!

I mistyped, I meant Estes

Estes is not as well spoken as some, but he seems to get his point across.

Yeahhhhhhh

now we pass 910? Stickland the puppet.

Dutton is playing the race card, he needs to realize that the courts can settle this whether the amendment is in the bill or not. The amendment merely repeats the law that is already there. I am not an attorney and this is not to be construed as legal advice.

Dutton sounded good yesterday, He is killing time today.

locke_n_load wrote:So, I have a question now that it looks like we may get OC without the Huffines/Dutton.
I am walking down the street, pistol in a holster on my hip, I have a CHL and am Open Carrying, and just walking, minding my own business. Can a cop come up and ask for my license? Would I legally have to give it to him? Can I tell him no, that I have a CHL but don't wish to give it to him, that it's included in the 4th amendment? I know that the penal code says that I must produce my license if I am concealed carrying, just wondering how all this would go with OC.
Thanks.

My understanding is that the law is the law whether or not it is repeatedly defined in each and every law passed. A person minding his own business and not breaking any laws should not be stopped by LEOs just to see if he is really not breaking the law. The amendments were just a reminder to liberal cities, counties and law enforcement official that they cannot make open carry uncomfortable to the law abiding citizen by LEO harassment. Whether or not this is physically written in the bill, it is still the law. The amendments were just a repeat of a law that is already in force. I am not an attorney nor is this legal advise just my opinion.