There are loitering laws that take care of that without passing new vague ones.mojo84 wrote:What about being outside of a building?twomillenium wrote:If it a public building not private, then I as a taxpaying owner gave myself permission. In a building that has been locked is already burglary, if it is open you do not need a reason if it is open to the public no matter the time of day. A vague law like this makes it tough on LEOs (not all) that are seemingly have problems understanding the laws in black and white.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Anyone have an issue with this city ordinance?”
- Sun Apr 08, 2018 6:58 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Anyone have an issue with this city ordinance?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 8475
Re: Anyone have an issue with this city ordinance?
- Sun Apr 08, 2018 3:14 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Anyone have an issue with this city ordinance?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 8475
Re: Anyone have an issue with this city ordinance?
If it a public building not private, then I as a taxpaying owner gave myself permission. In a building that has been locked is already burglary, if it is open you do not need a reason if it is open to the public no matter the time of day. A vague law like this makes it tough on LEOs (not all) that are seemingly have problems understanding the laws in black and white.