I have to agree with TAM. However, if they could just somehow allow it nation wide like a DL with no other federal involvement it would be okayThe Annoyed Man wrote:I don't really have a strong opinion one way or the other, but I can see a possible pro-gun argument for not supporting the bill........and that would be that federal involvement in firearms law is already too prevalent, and we either believe in states' rights, or we don't. In that light, isn't it possible that Rep. Burgess has a principled reason for not having cosponsored it? I don't know anything about the guy. How has he been on the 2nd Amanemdnet otherwise?
Search found 1 match
Return to “Missing CoSponsor for H.R.923 - Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015”
- Wed May 18, 2016 8:42 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Missing CoSponsor for H.R.923 - Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015
- Replies: 35
- Views: 7359