I would probably disagree with that statement. At least in the dense metropolitan areas. That is why the number of 30.06/07 signs went through the roof this past year. My opinion is that posting 06 indicates an attitude of "Icky guns! why do you need that?!?" and 07 indicates "I don't care, I just don't want to see it for my sake or for the sake of my other customers."Liberty wrote:Most people in Texas are comfortable with an armed public, and this is why we have come so far.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry”
- Fri Nov 18, 2016 9:45 am
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Replies: 128
- Views: 53001
Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:39 pm
- Forum: 2017 Legislative Wish List
- Topic: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
- Replies: 128
- Views: 53001
Re: Political Capital-Prohibited Places vs Constitutional Carry
At the beginning of last session, I'm pretty sure that I recall people saying their reps were indicating that there was limited support for open carry and very little for campus carry and we wound up with both.mojo84 wrote:I can tell you, I met with my rep, his chief of staff and one of his legislative affairs staffers and they all three said they get the impression there is zero appetite to pursue MAJOR new legislation in the area of guns and 2nd Amendment, most especially unlicensed carry. They indicate some minor cleanup and clarifying legislation may have a shot but nothing major.
That's just one rep but it appears they've been testing the water on this issue.
Last session was a FANTASTIC one for gun rights in Texas. My biggest hope is that the dishonesty of local officials regarding fines for signs receives attention at the capitol and will result in fewer off-limits locations for LTC holders as well as more teeth in SB273.