I agree - that would be my opinion as well, but I don't believe that there is any case law that would support this opinion. I don't care to be the test case either.txinvestigator wrote:It is my opinion that Federal Law allows a person to carry on PO property for "lawful purposes". Carrying under a CHL is a "lawful purpose"Flatland2D wrote:I'm no expert but I believe it's because post offices are federal property, and a state issued license can't give you permission to carry on federal ground.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Businesses that prohibit CHL”
- Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:29 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Businesses that prohibit CHL
- Replies: 91
- Views: 20452
- Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:44 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Businesses that prohibit CHL
- Replies: 91
- Views: 20452
Yes, I think you would be legal.jimlongley wrote:I do wonder, if I entered one of the anchor stores that is not posted on the outside, would I still be legal.
I think you would still be legal and that is what those "we aren't posted" stores were hinting at...jimlongley wrote: And would I be legal if I entered the mall from the anchor store, where there is also no posting at the mall entrance?