Could the "other lawful purpose" be used to describe carrying a concealed handgun under a Texas CHL as the Texas CHL law outlines? It would be hard to comply with the entirety of the CHL law without carrying a concealed handgun.18 U.S.C. 930(c) wrote:
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes
Search found 1 match
Return to “Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule”
- Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:43 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule
- Replies: 278
- Views: 137789