That recent judgement is interesting in light of this discussion. They said the team didn't provide adequate security. In the case of a violent crime at Target, the lawyers can say Target didn't provide adequate security AND told people not to provide their own security.RetNavy wrote:Target could be liable IF they any one brings up the recent ruling about the Giants fan who suffered head injuries when he was beaten up even though it was in a parking lot.... Stadium has to pay the most while the other two has to pay some.... victim lawyers argued that the stadium didnt provide adequate security...
just mine opinion
Some companies say they post signs for liability reasons. Maybe we can make posting those signs a bigger liability!
