Search found 1 match

by CHLLady
Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:27 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Lethal Force against an unarmed assailant(s)
Replies: 22
Views: 4476

Re: Lethal Force against an unarmed assailant(s)

C-dub wrote:Sure seems like deadly force would have been justified in this case if either of the victims had been armed. But, we all know that if deadly force had been used by one of the victims the liberal media would have turned it all around and gone on a witch hunt for the victim's actually defending themselves and it wouldn't matter how many thugs were attacking them or how badly they were hurt. If their injuries weren't life threatening and verified by a doctor afterwards any use of deadly force would be completely unnecessary in any liberal's eyes.
I agree! The woman had a fractured ankle, I believe.

The article I read about this story is that some in the group tried to rape her, she got away and got her boyfriend, they left the club and were attacked. Maybe the best course was to call police first before going outside.

Return to “Lethal Force against an unarmed assailant(s)”