TexasCHLforum.com

texanjoker wrote:

TrackinPat wrote:

texanjoker wrote:http://crosstalk.kinja.com/two-pistoler ... hellephant



Some more media coverage of this "event"

The guy who wrote that blog is absolutely... well.. I can't go there.. but wow, way to post the "facts"... Scrolling through the comments on that made me sick.

It was interesting reading a "view" from another side.

texanjoker wrote:http://crosstalk.kinja.com/two-pistoler ... hellephant



Some more media coverage of this "event"

anygunanywhere wrote:

o b juan wrote:how many licenses do the have in each staet and fed licenses..

Feds Pilots, Boat capts, Law practise before supreme court.. etc etc

Texas and other states,
Plumber, electrician, Air Condition, Architect, Nurse, Doctor, chiropractor, (Tatoo artist ??)
Bar owner, Meat market, fuel sales, and on and on there is a reason for all of them..

so why not for carrying a concealed gun..??

There should be a course or test just like for all the above FOR OPEN CARRY

I don't recall anywhere it being a right to be a plumber or pilot, nurse or doctor.

Anygunanywhere

philip964 wrote:Some of my posts are dead on arrival and others go crazy, hard to tell in advance.

I didn't really express my opinion in the first post, well I sort of did but not really.

So here is my two cents.

I'm not a fan of open carry. It scares people and they vote. I like CHL because essentially everyone can have a gun on them and the BG's don't know who.

That said I would like it if CHL's could carry what I will call "Canadian Mounty holster" where the gun is completely concealed by a leather flap with a snap. That would certainly make concealed carry easier, and it is not as scary. With small guns some might think it was a cell phone carrier.

These guys wanted to be arrested, and not being civil and polite to the police is counterproductive and bone headed wrong. Especially if they are doing what you want.

texanjoker wrote:

TrackinPat wrote:

talltex wrote:

texanjoker wrote:

bayouhazard wrote:

SherwoodForest wrote:Reality check. Those folks at the Capitol were engaged in a peaceful, and lawful assembly, and were violating NO TEXAS LAW.


Comparing trespassing to a bank robbery ? In most cases a person trespassing is afforded the opportunity to leave as was this case vs tying up resources making a misdemeanor arrest. There is no agenda in that other then to keep from wasting time on a petty misdemeanor arrest.

where did the trespassing comment come from?

In the top paragraph of the article it mentions they were arrested for criminal trespassing.

Thank you.

talltex wrote:

texanjoker wrote:

bayouhazard wrote:

SherwoodForest wrote:Reality check. Those folks at the Capitol were engaged in a peaceful, and lawful assembly, and were violating NO TEXAS LAW.


Comparing trespassing to a bank robbery ? In most cases a person trespassing is afforded the opportunity to leave as was this case vs tying up resources making a misdemeanor arrest. There is no agenda in that other then to keep from wasting time on a petty misdemeanor arrest.

where did the trespassing comment come from?

jmra wrote:One day these fools are going to get us all backed into a corner that we are going to be forced to fight our way out of.