TexasCHLforum.com

iratollah wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote: "Your... argument really isn't making any sense, Frank....er I mean Ira.

anygunanywhere wrote: I don't see where I was yelling and thanks for the personal attack.

Anygunanywhere

I never said you were yelling, rather you were being shrill. People do that sometimes when they aren't getting their way.

Ahhh, I see. You use the "Do as I say, not as I do" rebuttal methodology. My name's not Frank, Skippy. But I see that you'd prefer that I defer to your name calling and tuck my tail and cower. Well Yessir, you can have it your way. I won't call you Skippy anymore since it is somehow more offensive or personal than you calling me Frank. My friends call me tollah, you may call me sir.

I didn't object to how you addressed me.

I call people sir out of respect.

How you address me does not bother me. As the old saying goes, just don't call me late for supper.

People address me often as Anygun.

That is why I addressed you as Ira, the firsty part of your handle.

I will just address you as iratollah.

Your "why don't you guys OC your long guns if you want to OC because it is legal...." is a red herring argument, addds nothing to the discussion, and is irrelevant to the OC discussion since we are addressing the legalization of OC of handguns.

The OC of long arms is significantly more intimidating then OC of handguns. Ask those who recall Quannell the tenth doing it once in Houston.

If you have ever seen LEO anywhere toting long arms then you should agree it is intimidating.

People see LEO all the time with OC handguns. It is not as near intimidating.

Anygunanywhere

iratollah wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:Your "You guys should OC your long guns" argument really isn't making any sense, Frank....er I mean Ira. It is kind of like an argument about M-5 vending machines in airports.

Did you sleep through debate class Skippy? If I'm not making any sense then your comment looks positively delirious. And raising your voice an octave doesn't add value or credence your argument, although it does improve the entertainment value somewhat. Thanks for the chuckle.

Well, Ira, if you also equate using inappropriate words to bolster your side as proper debate then I really don't consider your side as worthy of the effort. Your way of debating sounds like you went to the Penthouse debate school and seriously raises doubt as to your credibility.

I don't see where I was yelling and thanks for the personal attack.

Anygunanywhere

iratollah wrote:

subsonic wrote:I open carry my rifle when I go hunting.

And this is relevant to my post or unique because...? Do you sling your rifle when you go into the feed store to buy your deer corn? You carry the rifle into the restaurant with you in the evening to avoid the risk of it being stolen from your car? The OC long gun will certainly offer you the same or better protection than a concealed handgun and you can start right away.

Let me know when you're willing to take the OC Wally Walk I suggested. I'll be pleased to meet you and document your experience so that others willing to take up the cause can see how well it went for you.

Your "You guys should OC your long guns" argument really isn't making any sense, Frank....er I mean Ira. It is kind of like an argument about M-5 vending machines in airports.

Anygunanywhere

iratollah wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:why don't you define that for the rest of the board.

Because if I have to explain it you wouldn't understand anyway...

I understand what it means and it does not meet the 10 yo daughter rule.


Anygunanywhere

Anygunanywhere

That's really nice. If you are saying what I think you are saying, why don't you define that for the rest of the board.

Anygunanywhere