I have heard there is a special place in hades for these types of evil individuals.The Annoyed Man wrote:As if their overt attempts to subvert the 2nd Amendment based on some incorrect assumptions were not somehow evil? If they were not first evil, they would not have pursued him in the first place. It's not just the matter of an argument over definitions. If they were not first evil, they would not be seeking to imprison a man and add his name to a registry of "gun offenders" for possession of some simple lead balls.Cedar Park Dad wrote:Or it means the law is badly written that permits musketry but is overbroad enough to include actual bullets (which may have been its real intent).VMI77 wrote:No he was just a corrupt or stupid judge. He himself asked how the bullets could be illegal when the firearm that shoots them is legal. Obviously the law was not clear since it took four prosecuting attorneys and a judge four hours to decide the issue. And that means the judge rendered an insane verdict to save face for the prosecution not to do justice.Cedar Park Dad wrote:Judge was correct. Those are bullets. If bullets are illegal then those would be illegal.
if however CARTRIDGES are whats illegal, then those are not cartridges and are not illegal.
Sounds like he had a bad lawyer.
Don't assume evil intent when ignorance will do (again the fault of the lawyer).
I understand the argument that the "loyal opposition" is usually not evil, just poorly informed; but when you seek to put a man in prison and brand him for life because of your ignorance, then you are no longer poorly informed, you are evil. Prison, and a criminal record, are not merely a difference of opinion; they are a consequence which permanently affects the life of the person less ignorant.......and nobody else.
They are evil, and I would be happy if DC were burned to the ground as a consequence of the evil of malicious prosecutors.
Anygunanywhere