No, it wasn't, it was plain English. I'm not going to argue about this. You've already made up your mind and put your words in my post.RHenriksen wrote:What you said was ambiguous.
Have a nice day.
Return to “SB 288 - Motorcycle "lane splitting" bill”
No, it wasn't, it was plain English. I'm not going to argue about this. You've already made up your mind and put your words in my post.RHenriksen wrote:What you said was ambiguous.
Is that what I said?RHenriksen wrote:So if someone engages in what might become a legal activity, you'll spit on them? Sounds like the antigunners who want to pepper spray people open carrying.OlBill wrote:I chew tobacco. Split at your own risk.
Another prohibition on me?parabelum wrote:The temperament of many drivers would be enough for me not to lane split. I can see some jerk fed up with traffic "accidentally" opening his door or just slightly positioning his vehicle to one side just to see what's happening with the traffic ahead. All purely "accidental" and with no ill intent, of course.
Would next bill address prohibition of door opening while in traffic?