TexasCHLforum.com

Sorry if I wasn't clear my comment to jnichols2 was my observation of how people think it should be, not how it is.

jnichols2 wrote:The feeling that a private property owner that chooses to start a business that deals with the public loses what property rights he had seems particularly strong. And this is coming from a forum dedicated to folks that chose to arm themselves in order to protect said rights.

What I am seeing is support for the Second Amendment to have the same status as other constitutional rights. If a business owner can post a legally binding sign prohibiting guns, they should be able to post legally binding signs prohibiting certain religious attire, etc. And the police should enforce those signs with equal zeal.

On the other hand, if a "No Turbans" sign is not legally valid than a "No Guns" sign shouldn't be either. The same should hold true for a company's HR policies.