Have you been asked to get out of the vehicle before you're asked for ID? Or do you get out before the officer approaches?PArrow wrote:I'll give you the on or about your person, but if the gun is in the center console of your car and you are standing at the back bumper I don't believe it's "on or about your person. About would imply within easy reach.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “A "first" when stopped by DPS last night”
- Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:43 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
- Replies: 187
- Views: 36156
Re: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
- Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:35 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
- Replies: 187
- Views: 36156
Re: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
Age doesn't always bring wisdom. Too often, age comes alone.tomtexan wrote:Wisdom comes with age. You can sure tell there are some young opinions being expressed here.
- Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:20 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
- Replies: 187
- Views: 36156
Re: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
Do cop bikes have video/audio recording like the cars? If he said that knowing he was being recorded...knljr wrote: At that point, I was like what the heck - and I told him that I saw him way before he saw me and that I was in the middle of a pack of cars and was keeping up with the traffic to which he replied, "Well, that's what happens when you drive the fast car...".
My sister-in-law is an attorney and I told her the story. Long story short, got off scott-free on that one.
- Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:36 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
- Replies: 187
- Views: 36156
Re: A "first" when stopped by DPS last night
Not to hijack the thread, but to get it back to a discussion of a previously mentioned odd stop...
OK, now I've looked around and found the state law, and it says:
So I suppose the LEO thought VMI77 had a GPS attached to the windshield that was obstructing or reducing the driver's clear view.
I've moved away from windshield mounts because they keep falling off in the summer heat. My current mount is a binder clip and two rubber bands. (I skipped step 2.) And I got my wife one that mounts low on the dashboard (because her prindle stick is too close to the vent).
ETA: Why isn't this in "LEO Contacts & Bloopers"?
Whoa, wait. Where in Texas is that illegal?VMI77 wrote:he pulled me over because he thought I had a GPS attached to my windshield
OK, now I've looked around and found the state law, and it says:
I thought general consensus was that windshield mounts that didn't block your view were legal in Texas. I've used them low, keeping the GPS (or more recently, the phone) near the dashboard.TRANSPORTATION CODE / TITLE 7. VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC / SUBTITLE C. RULES OF THE ROAD / CHAPTER 547. VEHICLE EQUIPMENT / SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS wrote:Sec. 547.613. RESTRICTIONS ON WINDOWS. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a person commits an offense that is a misdemeanor:
(1) if the person operates a motor vehicle that has an object or material that is placed on or attached to the windshield or side or rear window and that obstructs or reduces the operator's clear view
So I suppose the LEO thought VMI77 had a GPS attached to the windshield that was obstructing or reducing the driver's clear view.
I've moved away from windshield mounts because they keep falling off in the summer heat. My current mount is a binder clip and two rubber bands. (I skipped step 2.) And I got my wife one that mounts low on the dashboard (because her prindle stick is too close to the vent).
ETA: Why isn't this in "LEO Contacts & Bloopers"?