TexasCHLforum.com

gljjt

mojo84 wrote:
gljjt wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
Let's keep in mind, Supreme Court appointees must be confirmed by the Senate.
And that prevented Sotomayor and Kagan from being confirmed?
I can't remember, who had the majority in the Senate at the time they were confirmed?

Also, are we adversaries or on the same team?

We are on the same team. I see now how my comment came across. My apologies. It was not directed at you. My intent was to say, as you did, nothing is 100%. Sotomayor garnered 9 Republican votes and Kagan got 5. Neither would have been confirmed without Republican help. The Dems had the majority in the Senate for both, but not Dem enough votes to confirm.

gljjt

mojo84 wrote:
Let's keep in mind, Supreme Court appointees must be confirmed by the Senate.

And that prevented Sotomayor and Kagan from being confirmed?

gljjt

Jim Beaux wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Jim Beaux wrote:Instead of denigrating those of us who will no longer run with the herd & support an unprincipled candidate & a corrupt system, maybe you should consider the future for your children & grandchildren. If we lose our constitution it will not be because of a president, but a malignant system.

I will not look at my sons and tell them that everything I taught them was morally right, I went against.
I am thinking of my grandchildren when I do the best I can in a bad, no critical situation. You can teach your sons to "sit this one out" because you don't like the choices, but I'll tell mine to suit up and fight the best they can fight. Doing nothing is not an option.

Chas.
Ive made my choice & will be voting for the candidate who best represents my values.

And in my opinion, in this election, that will destroy our great nation. It may be a feel good move to "stick it to the man", but the ultimate cost we cannot afford.

gljjt

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Jim Beaux wrote:Instead of denigrating those of us who will no longer run with the herd & support an unprincipled candidate & a corrupt system, maybe you should consider the future for your children & grandchildren. If we lose our constitution it will not be because of a president, but a malignant system.

I will not look at my sons and tell them that everything I taught them was morally right, I went against.
I am thinking of my grandchildren when I do the best I can in a bad, no critical situation. You can teach your sons to "sit this one out" because you don't like the choices, but I'll tell mine to suit up and fight the best they can fight. Doing nothing is not an option.

Chas.

And again.... "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ~ Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Hillary is evil.

gljjt

Jim Beaux wrote:...I will now vote my conscience.

And my conscience says Hillary must not be president.

gljjt

parabelum wrote:All Trump bashers, why can't you go to one of Bernie/Hillary/BLM sites and join the bash/smear club over there, and just leave the rest of us who are not living in the alternate universe alone.

You are doing Hillary's bidding and damaging 2A blindly.

What are you out to accomplish if you're not working for the other side? If you're just venting I get it. But it's always the same folks which make me think you know...

Hillary must be stopped and you're impeding our efforts.

^^^ This

TexasCHLforum.com

Search found 6 matches

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?

Re: Republican Convention: Cruz supporters planning trouble?