I think most concern is with the calendars committee, not this one.Kolamer wrote:So now that the bill has passed the Senate, how hard will it be to pass the House Committee?
Search found 22 matches
Return to “SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.”
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:33 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:12 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
It's in committee at this moment.locke_n_load wrote:what time does the House start debate on the OC bill (HB910 I believe)?
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 12:05 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 11:59 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Here comes the vote
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 10:11 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Thank you!joelamosobadiah wrote:Looks like 11:00 AMTVGuy wrote:When will today's vote be?
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:55 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
When will today's vote be?
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:55 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
No additional time, just adding info about retention and why it may be wise to use. Not a big deal.RPBrown wrote:Okay, I did not get to hear any of the discussions yesterday and now I am confused (not unusual though).
As I understand it, the amendment to require a retention holster was tabled. However there was an amendment that requires additional training added to new classes on proper retention of firearms. Is this is correct? and if so, WHY the additional class requirements?
Sounds like typical bureaucracy to me.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:23 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Training of departments I believe, but I'm not 100%. If I recall the bill's author himself filed the amendment, so there must have been ample reason.mojo84 wrote:Prepare for what?TVGuy wrote:Estes approved it because DPS requested him to move the date to give them more time to prepare.Winchster wrote:Can somebody tell me what the logic was that allowed this to be put off until next January?
I don't see four months as that big of a deal.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:10 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Estes approved it because DPS requested him to move the date to give them more time to prepare.Winchster wrote:Can somebody tell me what the logic was that allowed this to be put off until next January?
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:23 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
What did Huffines say? I missed that part and am one of his constituents.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:21 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Very true, thought of that earlier today and wondered if that was the case.Charles L. Cotton wrote:The vote to reduce the Senate's 2/3 (21 votes) to 3/5 (19 votes) is glaringly important now. SB17 would never have been brought up for vote if we still has the 2/3 rule.
Chas.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:07 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Back up, I believe they are still debating it.
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 5:02 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
Video cut off at 5pm. Huh?
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:58 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
It's not part of the bill.Ruark wrote:What exactly does it mean to "table" the amendment? Vote on it later (which delays things)?
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 4:48 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
- Replies: 472
- Views: 86823
Re: SB17 OC Bill On Intent Calendar for 3-16-2015.
An amendment was added to push the date back. I believe it would now be 1/1/16.CoffeeNut wrote:Thanks!txglock21 wrote:September 1, 2015...(if I'm not mistaken).CoffeeNut wrote:Out of curiosity if these pass and the Governor signs how quickly can/will they take effect?
