TexasCHLforum.com

JRG wrote:

bblhd672 wrote:
I have about 20 Magpul PMags v2, both window and non-window, as well as 10 Troy Battlemags (which I'm not impressed with), and just purchased 10 D&H Aluminum mags ($7.99 each at Palmetto State Armory http://palmettostatearmory.com/review/p ... t/id/1239/ with free shipping). If these new metal mags work well I plan on buying more.

D&H 5.56 30rd Aluminum Magazine
Aluminum, 6061 – T0 Body. Resistance welded to US Military Specifications
Aluminum Magazine Body
is Heat Treated to T6, then Hardcoat Anodized
Magazine Body Black Teflon
Spring is 17-7PH Checked for Compression with a Chatillon Gauge
Follower: Magpul Foliage Green OR Yellow Anti-Tilt Follower

Please keep us informed about the D&H magazines.

Joe

D&H magazines are good to go. No issues with them!

JRG wrote:Okay, I have done more research and perhaps have a new weapon to purchase. I know I was set on getting the M&P AR 15 Sport II, but now have seen the Springfield Armory Saint. I LIKE it. It is about $300 more than the Sport II, but that would not be a problem.

Anybody have the Saint? Shot one? Pros? Cons?

Joe

The Saint looks good, but only if you like the configuration and the furniture that is on it. It costs a little more because it has upgraded hand guard, stock, and grip from BCM. It also has a mid length gas system, and a 1:8 twist barrel.

It looks to be a decent buy, but again only if you like how it comes out of the box. If you are going to want to get rid of the A2 front sight and free float the barrel, I would go with a different firearm.

Here is an article that explains the differences between gen 2 and gen 3 PMAGs.
https://www.bayoutactical.com/differenc ... ag-gen-m3/

As far as which mags, PMAGs are good. I have many Gen 2 and no issues. Also D&H aluminum magazines (GI Mags) with Magpul followers.

Ameer wrote:

KC5AV wrote:I have no idea as to the quality of the rifle, but Primary Arms has a complete AR for $399.
And another one.

The first is sold out now and the second has 2 stars on the Primary Arms website but it's only one review. Does anybody have experience with the Radical brand? Any company can have a lemon but some have a bushel. Google search has some drama that isn't about the build quality.

Is the second rifle worth grabbing as a truck/trunk gun or should I save my money for a famous name brand?

If it were me, I would spend the extra for the the tried and true, well reviewed S&W M&P 15 Sport II. Has already been proven and is backed by a well known manufacturer.

ninjabread wrote:

cyphertext wrote:I wouldn't recommend the Ruger just because of their non-standard parts... especially the use of an non-shrouded firing pin.

I have long avoided Colt because of their Clinton Pins and other non-spec garbage.

Colt is all back to mil-spec parts now. Strange that Ruger decided to use the old Colt semi auto carrier design that no one uses anymore.

Liberty wrote:I don't own one, but I've been looking at the Ruger AR 223 It's going for $600 and change, It has pretty good reviews, It has dust covers and forward assist, a reputation for being very reliable and trouble free. It is a Ruger and so it can be expected to be rugged reliable and that the company will stand behind their product.

I wouldn't recommend the Ruger just because of their non-standard parts... especially the use of an non-shrouded firing pin.

Lynyrd wrote:

Odiferous wrote:

Lynyrd wrote:...don't settle for one without a forward assist...

Not wanting to start the forward assist religious debate, but just thought your phrasing was interesting. I usually see the lack of a FA called a feature (often costing more) rather than something to settle for.

There is a reason for the forward assist. I have needed it, and wouldn't want to be without it.

Yes, the reason for the forward assist is that the Army couldn't let go of the design of the M1 and M14 with operating rods. While the military still trains SPORTS for stoppages, many shooting schools no longer do. For a battle field rifle that may not get proper cleaning and maintenance regularly, it has it's place. For a civilian rifle that is used at the range, I would rather clear the round than force it into the chamber.

Have a M&P 15 Sport (the original one) and a BCM rilfe... have not needed forward assist on either.

To the OP, for a range rilfe, plinker, HD... the M&P Sport 2 is hard to beat IF you like how it comes and are going to leave it mostly stock.