Search found 2 matches

by seph
Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:39 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: New Suppressor Law = No Good
Replies: 20
Views: 25650

Re: New Suppressor Law = No Good

ajwakeboarder wrote: Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:21 pm
srothstein wrote: Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:41 am
carlson1 wrote: Fri Jun 18, 2021 1:12 am Could you not build your own suppressor and it be legal?
Under the current state of federal law, anything which might affect interstate commerce can be regulated. The logic in the Wickard case was that his wheat was regulated, even though he grew it for his own personal use, because if he did not have it then he would be buying wheat that was involved in interstate commerce.

This is why the new law is a great symbol but is not really any use. If you build your own suppressor, even with all Texas sourced materials, you have affected interstate commerce by not engaging in it. Thus, Congress can regulate anything and make it illegal.
So hypothetically, my argument would be that it does not affect interstate commerce because I would simply not buy a suppressor if I cannot do so without paying the federal tax.
Or even better, pass a Texas law that bans suppressors from outside the state to be sold here thus eliminating any application of interstate trade. :shock:
by seph
Fri Jun 18, 2021 9:47 am
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: New Suppressor Law = No Good
Replies: 20
Views: 25650

Re: New Suppressor Law = No Good

The point of this law was to setup the legal challenge. In that regard, it is a good law. It just does not change things until the legal challenge runs it's course in the next half dozen years.

Return to “New Suppressor Law = No Good”