TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 05, 2022 1:57 pm https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/ ... s-suspects

Highway 90 shut down due to threat from man at motels.

Large police presence.

The crazies are out and active.

They used to draw and quarter people or burn them at the stake.
Maybe there was a reason.

srothstein wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 10:53 pm

C-dub wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 10:07 pm

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm
Uvalde Police and school police no longer Cooperating with State Police investigation.

I think this is incorrect. I read that it was the chief of the school districts police that was not responding to a second interview request. He is not part of the Uvalde PD.

The Chief has obviously heard our advice to never talk to the police after you are involved in a shooting. The governor and the media have already characterized his decision as wrong and are looking for someone to blame for this tragedy. We all know who is primarily at fault here (the shooter), but there are enough mistakes that someone else will go down in flames. Will it just be a career ending decision or are they going to try to put someone in jail over this?

Look at what the media is doing to the Uvalde ISD Police Chief. Look at what they were doing to the unnamed teacher who propped the door open to go get something from her car. Does anyone on this forum still think the advice to not talk to the police if you are involved in a shooting is bad advice?

PS> I do not know if the ISD chief made a bad decision or not. I was not there and I do not know what was happening when he made the decision. I do know that the investigation is now going to take an even longer time to complete, at least in part because of the rush to judgment. I also do know that there are very different protocols for police handing an active shooter versus a barricaded armed subject, either with or without hostages.

anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 7:56 pm [img

Cowards. Disgusting.

Soccerdad1995 wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 4:14 pm If someone can show actual evidence that LGBTQ+ people are significantly more likely to commit violent felonies, then a discussion about restricting their access to weapons might make sense. But without that type of evidence, it just comes across as bigoted, to be mild.

Post by 03Lightningrocks » Wed May 25, 2022 12:33 pm

There was a scene in the movie where this whack job was dancing around in mirror wearing his moms panties, "tucked". But it was too x rated for forum. Someone said they saw a pick of shooter dressed like a girl. I made a tongue in cheek comment about the LGTB alphabet group all being mentally deficient and on the "no-buy" list. Then the subject veered off to never never land from there. My fault and my apologies! Mods are welcome to delete all posts involved and my original post that started it.