Neither the thread nor the forum for this.anygunanywhere wrote:As they should be.nitrogen wrote:We should have attached Open Carry and Campus carry to an anti-abortion bill. We can get THOSE passed pretty reliably.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry”
- Tue May 12, 2015 4:08 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
- Replies: 249
- Views: 45838
Re: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
- Tue May 12, 2015 3:48 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
- Replies: 249
- Views: 45838
Re: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
Thanks for the elaboration
- Tue May 12, 2015 2:15 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
- Replies: 249
- Views: 45838
Re: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
OK, let's take this to an extreme for argument's sake, shall we? If a movie theater/restaurant/convention center posted a sign out front that said "No Whites allowed," do you think that would fly? How about "No Christians?"ScooterSissy wrote:I'm a little lost on the last one. If you're talking about a government facility, I agree; but they aren't permitted to do so now by law, some cities/counties just do it in spite of the law. If you're talking about private businesses, I have to disagree. They should be permitted to disallow guns for any reason they choose. I'm a big believer in 2A rights, but I'm also a believer in property rights. I'll let them know my displeasure by using my wallet.Taypo wrote:Personally, I'm more disappointed in the process than I am in the individual bills. The legislature seems to be a joke right now.
I flip flop on the merits of OC, but I'm in total agreement that campus carry should be available. I also think 30.06 needs to be reexamined to determine some form of requirements for posting. Being uncomfortable with guns shouldn't give a location the ability to deny a right.
If you honestly believe 2A grants everyone the power to carry, then how is it different than racial/religious/orientation discrimination?
Please do keep in mind that I'm very much middle of the road on this, but I'm curious to see where the line is for folks.
- Tue May 12, 2015 12:10 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
- Replies: 249
- Views: 45838
Re: Campus Carry revived, attached to open carry
Personally, I'm more disappointed in the process than I am in the individual bills. The legislature seems to be a joke right now.
I flip flop on the merits of OC, but I'm in total agreement that campus carry should be available. I also think 30.06 needs to be reexamined to determine some form of requirements for posting. Being uncomfortable with guns shouldn't give a location the ability to deny a right.
I flip flop on the merits of OC, but I'm in total agreement that campus carry should be available. I also think 30.06 needs to be reexamined to determine some form of requirements for posting. Being uncomfortable with guns shouldn't give a location the ability to deny a right.