Like everyone else, he has his own agenda. It would be very unprofessional for anyone to seek him out and say anything or post negative reviews regarding his testimony. Everyone who puts themselves out there to testify should be able to do so without any harassment. There are also lots of folks who disagree with OC supporters, particularly on this subject, folks should be on their best behavior and not hooting and hollering in the gallery for example.
I've met a ton of folks who do seek out additional training on their own if they feel they need it. So, I don't think it needs to be forced in to form of more requirements, that's just my opinion. He probably sees people that scare him, and need more training, and that's his opinion.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now”
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:49 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 42773
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 9:55 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 42773
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
He said he would be afraid to give a grade below a "B" again.
I'd like to point out that to get a license, unless a veteran you need to be 21. That means, that most likely 75% of students will not be eligible to carry either way. Regarding experimentation of students with drugs and drinking, so campuses are admitting students are breaking the law at under 21 years of age. I believe that any student who is 21 and wants to carry is going to be responsible.
I'd like to point out that to get a license, unless a veteran you need to be 21. That means, that most likely 75% of students will not be eligible to carry either way. Regarding experimentation of students with drugs and drinking, so campuses are admitting students are breaking the law at under 21 years of age. I believe that any student who is 21 and wants to carry is going to be responsible.